Killer Cyborg wrote:If you're right, and DNA tampering interferes with the power, then the CS would never have bothered to develop dogboys at all.
I don't agree here. The CS fights more than just supernatural creatures who can be damaged by dog bites, and ignoring that, a Dog Boy with a WP sword and a vibro-blade is going to be inflicting more damage (and with a higher reliability of inflicting and avoiding damage) than a dog is. Plus Dog Boys are more intelligent so you can manage them and preserve them longer.
I think the CS probably initially started with dogs, found they were helpful against the supernatural, and this motivated them to make the Dog Boys. Upon discovering that the mutation removed their ability to harm the supernatural with HtH, they still found them useful as expendable foot soldiers who could detect the supernatural (and communicate what they detect via language, which dogs can't) and engage it with vibro-tech and even used ranged weapons.
Heck, considering the flying supernatural beings out there, a dog boy with a laser rifle is going to be a little more useful than a dog unless you have dog cannons to launch your mutts at the nearest gargoyle or dragon.
Even without flight there are often situations where terrain impedes being able to pursue or surround an enemy. A bipedal dog boy with opposable thumbs (and who can use vibro-hooks to aid in their climbing) could pursue a supernatural being hiding in a tree, or up on a pile of rocks, better than some dog can.
Also, seeing as how I am strongly necro-ing this awesome thread that brought to light something I was completely unaware of (making Chaos Earth basically essential for Rifts to understand the world) it's worth noting how much more awesome this makes the Hound-Masters in Dead Reign should they venture into Rifts.
It also makes me wonder, with the way vampires have the ability to summon (and control) canines (also wolves, presumably they also damage supernaturals? dunno) if this is used in vamp vs vamp warfare (would vampires try to wrestle control of each other's dogs away from the other?) and if it's part of how vampires keep other supernatural beings in their territory at bay or from dominating them.
argos wrote:Man didnt evolve from ape, man allegedly evolved from prehsitoric man, which was similar to ape.
Killer Cyborg wrote:Humans are not evolved from apes. We simply have a common ancestor with apes. Saying that we've evolved from apes is like saying that you are descended from your cousin.
Since everyone's getting all biological here, we did evolve from apes, because we ARE apes. Ape is a term that covers all hominoids, which are a form of simian, which are a form of primate.
Hominoids include lesser apes (like gibbons) and greater ones (aka hominids, including us, chimps, gorillas, and orangutans).
Some use "ape" to mean "any hominoid except humans because we're special" but it's a bunch of arbitrary nonsense. Genetically we have more in common with a chimp than a chimp does with a gibbon so there's no valid reason to group them as a category we exclude ourselves from.
Even if we don't accept 'ape' for humans, I'm confident we probably would accept it for the most recent common ancestor of humans and gibbons. I side with Michael Benton's usage of human inclusion though: "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orang-utan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans"
Josh Sinsapaugh wrote:In the original Rifts Main Book, it stated that Dog Boys are SAMAS pilots in Lone Star, a point that was contradicted in the Lone Star World Book.
Does Lone Star UTTERLY forbid it? I'm left wondering if there might be secret dog boy SAMAS divisions (perhaps using the older model getting thrown out in favour of the new SUPER models, kind of like how dog boys are getting upgraded from partial MDC armor to old-style Dead Boy armor) or maybe the SAMAS thing was a top secret experiment that they cancelled after Bradford got flack from Prosek for putting too much power in non-human hands.
Killer Cyborg wrote:Biological / Isolation species
A set of actually or potentially interbreeding populations. This is generally the most useful formulation for scientists working with living examples of the higher taxa like mammals, fish, and birds, but meaningless for organisms that do not reproduce sexually.
Since dogs and wolves can interbreed, this would mean that they are the same species by this definition.
I'd favour this interpretation except I'd add the requirement of needing fertile offspring to avoid the whole mule/liger problem so that lions and tigers aren't considered the same species. Pretty sure wolf/dog would produce fertile offspring though.
Killer Cyborg wrote:Magic works off of perception, and people see dogs and wolves as being different. They have different associations with them. It goes along with the "Man's Best Friend" angle that you like. Wolves certainly aren't seen that way, but dogs are.
It makes me wonder how human perception would tie into things though. Do dogs damage the supernatural because of our faith in domesticated breeds? Humans have historically (prior to domestication) had faith in wolves though, and probably less faith in breeds who don't do much or who are human-attackers.
Our love for cats is also great (they helped fight pestilence) and they got worshipped, yet they only harm a selective amount of supernatural creatures, not all of them.
Maybe it's because of dogs being omnivores and not purely carnivores?
argos wrote:Ectoplasmic Bidet wrote:a human can't mate with a chimp or other primates.
Im workin hard to disprove that theory
an understandable aspirationLet's keep in mind folks that Lone Star lets chimps have up to 14 PB, and in TMNT like other animals they get the standard 3d6 (why is Michelangelo prettier than April?)
Killer Cyborg wrote:I'd say that dog-boys can breed with dogs, but not viable offspring. They are too mutated for their offspring to live. Also, they generally don't find normal dogs attractive.
I'd say they're too different to be able to mate. We have a lot more in common with chimps than dog boys do with dogs, all things neutral, and I'm doubtful we could even produce mule-like offspring with them.
As far as generally not finding normal dogs attractive, I can agree... but I expect they do at a slightly higher frequency than humans do, and the fringe elements of humanity seem to manage somehow...