Nightmask wrote: Pepsi Jedi wrote:Nightmask wrote:I haven't seen anywhere that it says it requires a million-credit nuclear reactor to recharge an e-clip, just because the portable recharger makes use of one doesn't make that a requirement it just means they went with the reactor because it was a compact, easily portable energy source with a decent lifespan good for many recharges. There's at least one rifle that you can recharge its E-clip battery using a solar panel array that comes with it, clearly you don't require an expensive power source to do the recharging. In any case the average PC group unless going out of its way to be anti-technology is going to have vehicles or other items that would allow them to do free recharging of their E-clips and those of others they meet if they feel like it.
Not 'In any case'. I'm not trying to be a stickler, but this rounds back to the "The nuclear reactor in my power armor or nuclear powered vehicle has battery terminals like a car battery and you can just run some jumper cables from it to your eclips and recharge them.
It's not that easy. Nothing in rifts even alludes to such a thing. It'd be like some marine on a Aircraft carrier trying to recharge his laptop by running some cables from the reactor to his computer.
Pepsi Flatline already said just drop the strawman arguments.
It might surprise you to know. I don't take commands from Flatline, or you.
And again it's not a strawman.
Nightmask wrote:
No one other than yourself has stated or implied you can 'just run some jumper cables off a nuclear supply and recharge an e-clip'.
Go re-read the 4 pages. Noone said 'Jumpercables' but yes, they very much implied it was that easy, and even here they're stating it again. "Oh anyone with a vehicle with a nuclear power supply can easily recharge eclips off it". Am I typing out their exact words? No. I'm paraphrasing. Their exact words are just as silly. They just try and use more of them.
Nightmask wrote:
If you don't understand how electricity works or electrical terminology you shouldn't try telling the people who do that they're wrong or have said things that they haven't
I understand how it works perfectly. it's not that difficult. I suggest you and others try and get some clue about nuclear reactors. Even fictional ones. They surely don't have a couple of poles/terminals stickin' off the top or side you can just run cables to what ever you want to juice. There's a good deal more to it than that.
Even the CONCEPT of "Jury rigging a nuclear reactor" should stop you in your tracks as to how amazingly 1) FUNNY, or 2) STUPID it is. You're either joking or WOW. to act like it's EASY and common practice to do so just expounds on it.
Nightmask wrote:
Being a text-environment it's impossible to show you a simple block diagram to correct your errors but ALL sources of electrical power have the output in the basic format of a ground/return and the required voltage/current output. Some have a variety of flavors (the PC power supply outputs in at least 3 different voltages depending on what's meant to be powered) some have just one (car battery) but it does not matter what's producing the power the outputs are all fundamentally the same.
A nuclear power supply built to run 15 years solid, powering a robot or power armor with the power of a modern day tank platoon, while being so hyper advanced as to be the size of a hockey puck, is not the same as a car battery. Don't care how many times you say it. The concept is absurd.
Nightmask wrote:
As far as the marine goes, he'd either be a moron trying that stunt or he'd be hooking up to an output feed from the reactor that's compatible to the power requirements of the computer because that Aircraft Carrier's nuclear reactor is in the end generating power by the same methods as a coal plant or hydroelectric dam.
And that's partially my point. You'd have to be a moron to try and hook directly to a nuclear reactor as people are saying.
Nightmask wrote: I gather you don't understand how such things work, as they're turbines powered by the heat given off by the pile which runs a generator with the required output, an output that may go into a converter to adjust it to other required outputs.
I understand perfectly how they work. I'm no nuclear scientists but I get it. And again that's part of the point. There's a LOT of things between A (( the reactor)) and all the stuff inbetween to get to Z ( some sort of convverter and power regulation machinery ect that allows some guy on deck 15 4000 feet away to plug into an outlet with their computer.
People above are skipping all that. They're trying to run cables from their Reactor to their eclip and call 'er done.
Nightmask wrote:
The car battery btw is in the position of the E-clip, the car generator which is powered by the engine is in the position of the Nuclear Core. The battery just provides enough juice to get the engine started at which point the car's generator takes over all electrical requirements of the vehicle and outputs power to keep the battery recharged as it senses it running down. As long as the car is running it can charge up battery after battery (i.e. E-clip after E-clip) because it's set up that way.
As far as the ease of recharging E-clips go, odds are the writers at Palladium aren't possessed of backgrounds in electronics technology or electrical engineering so not recognizing how easy it should be to recharge an e-clip particularly for those with such an education is understandable.
While I fully agree that they're not electric engineers, and do hand wave an enormous ammount of 'science' in the 'Science fiction". The cost of recharging eclips has staid high for 20+ years. It's been brought up to them and it's been kept. That's on purpose.
So something in the "FICTIONAL" object of an Eclip... makes it harder than you think it should be. It's their world. They say it's harder. So it's harder in their world. Remember the FICTION in Science fiction.
Nightmask wrote:
They almost completely gloss over the idea of E-clips and the recharging thereof, other than to note how easy it is for someone with the requisite skill to jury-rig an e-clip charger and if someone with the skill can easily make one then they actually aren't that hard to recharge.
They gloss over most scientific things. I agree with you there. They don't note that it's that easy. 50 books and probably 100s of OOC's and stuff and there's still only a small handfull of ways. There's nothing to imply that you can just slap some cables on the thing and be done with it.
The fact that the recharger costs $750,000, implys it's no small thing.