a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

This is a place for G.M.s and GM wannabes to share ideas and their own methods of play. It is not a locked forum so be aware your players may be watching!

Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones

User avatar
Erinoth
D-Bee
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:59 pm

a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Erinoth »

The game idea I had is for people to play the heads of the major governments of Rifts Earth. The plan is to advance the world as a whole. Having players run the major and important minor factions running political negotiations and/or black ops. As they expand their influence into more distant regions discovering each other. would be alot of political stuff I don't do very well. I would like to know what other people think of this as a possible game scenario.
"I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. Some come from ahead and some come from behind. But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see. Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!" - Dr. Seuss

The Online Game thread
User avatar
Killer Cyborg
Priest
Posts: 27954
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2001 2:01 am
Comment: "Your Eloquence with a sledge hammer is a beautiful thing..." -Zer0 Kay
Location: In the ocean, punching oncoming waves
Contact:

Re: a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Killer Cyborg »

Definitely possible to do.
Might be tricky with Palladium's system.
Annual Best Poster of the Year Awards (2012)

"That rifle on the wall of the laborer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." -George Orwell

Check out my Author Page on Amazon!
User avatar
Bill
Megaversal® Ambassador
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:25 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Bill »

I don't think it's really doable as a RPG. How often would all of the player characters be in the same scene? As a board game, like Diplomacy or Risk, it could be made to work. Sounds like a lot of effort to put into a game that you may not play often though. On the other hand, if you could pitch it to Palladium, it might make a decent project for publication. Assuming of course that they have the resources necessary to support it.
User avatar
Dark
Wanderer
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 5:46 am

Re: a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Dark »

I suggest taking a look at Birthright, an older D&D setting.

Playing rulers and whatnot is very doable, IMO.

Do the characters in Game of Thrones, for example, not have and/or go on adventures?

You just have to balance the plot to giving meaningful stakes, challenges, and rewards to everyone. And if having players together for playing directly involved scenes is something you view as necessary consider having them all be in the same court/faction etc. as the major movers/shakers of that group.
V/R,

Dark

Adventure is someone else in deep ****, far far away.
If you want to learn something new, read an old book.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority.
My Keiretsu is bigger than yours.
User avatar
Erinoth
D-Bee
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Erinoth »

I was thinking it would work in a play by post type of game. Especially with the players most likely plottiing against each other.
I could do it in a fantasy setting, but I really like the idea of rifts setting
"I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. Some come from ahead and some come from behind. But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see. Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!" - Dr. Seuss

The Online Game thread
User avatar
Bill
Megaversal® Ambassador
Posts: 1567
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:25 pm
Location: Reno, Nevada

Re: a difficult (for me anyways) game idea

Unread post by Bill »

Oh, sure. That can work. The role-playing aspect is kind of minimal there. You'd need to depart significantly from the standard megaversal rules for it though. I think you'll have to establish the time increment of a turn as a month or more for starters. Then decide how many turns different actions should take and how many orders a player can give in any given turn. Like ordering an attack may take less than a turn if military assets are available, but training military assets will take three months for conscript infantry to six years for magic specialists. And if it's a small nation like Manistique the player just wont be able to do as much as a multiple-world spanning empire like Splynn.

Action resolution can still be left up to a roll-under percentile or contested D20 though, so it'll feel a lot like Rifts. You'll just have to work out names for the abilities employed in the rulership of a nation and consistent modifiers for different actions. For example, if the leader of the Manistique Imperium wanted to do some industrial espionage on Free Quebec, she'd roll Intelligence Gathering modified by the number of turns she's willing to give her operatives as well as the number and quality of those operatives; which you'd define as part of the nation's resources. Success on the roll would return a temporary or permanent bonus to the military, commercial, or infrastructure resources of Manistique while failure would result in a loss of intelligence gathering resources and a possible increase in hostilities between the two countries.

You might want to read up on government simulation games for ideas.
Post Reply

Return to “G.M.s Forum”